|
TurbX TM Engines Inc.Engine Systems based on TurbX Technology Provide Highest Efficiency, Lowest Cost, Lowest Maintenance, and Lowest Environmental Impact.
(Rendering of the 1:1 TurbX Engine20hp) (Rendering of the 3:1 TurbX Engine 100hp TurbX TM Engines Inc.September
2001
Support
for TurbX engine technology breakthrough is gaining momentum. External
agencies that have reviewed this revolutionary technology had the
following comments: From:
"Jim Conklin" <conklinjc@ornl.gov> To:
<mw@turbx.com>; <cw@turbx.com> Cc:
<rao-arimilli@utk.edu> Sent:
Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:25 AM Subject:
TurbX testing to date at the NTRC A
TurbX engine prototype is currently undergoing performance testing at the
National Transportation Research Center (NTRC), in Knoxville, Tennessee.
The NTRC is a joint operation of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the
University of Tennessee. James
C. Conklin, Ph.D., ORNL/TM-2000/116
March 2000 COMPARISON
OF PRIME MOVERS SUITABLE
FOR USMC EXPEDITIONARY POWER
SOURCES T. J. Theiss, J. C. ConklinM J. F. Thomas, T. R. Armstrong Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) A recent invention (Wilson, 1999), a rotating turbomachinery device that
operates on the Atkinson cycle, was recently brought to ORNL for
evaluation. This particular device cleverly employs the compression,
constant volume combustion, expansion and constant pressure expansion
processes on one rotating wheel. This particular concept should not have
the unsteady loss problem of the pulse detonation engine because
supersonic waves are not needed for combustion. Because of the rotary
configuration, this concept will not have the disadvantageous power
density of the reciprocating piston variation of the Atkinson cycle.
Indeed, preliminary analysis of the ideal cycle thermodynamics by ORNL
personnel shows that this version of the Atkinson cycle has a power
density per unit mass of working fluid greater than that of the ideal
Brayton cycle for a given compression ratio. A 15 kW demonstration model
of the design has been fabricated and successfully tested under very
limited conditions. Thus, the Wilson (TurbX*)
configuration of the Atkinson cycle has a very high potential for a heat
engine to provide mobile power because of its high efficiency and high
power density. For a practical engine, however, there are a number
of design and operating characteristics that need to be considered and
tested. The non-ideal, real world considerations of friction and
unavoidable heat losses will result in a lessening of the ideal efficiency
of this like any other thermodynamic cycle, and these non-ideal
considerations must be quantified and considered in a practical machine. This
Wilson (TurbX*) engine has the potential for improving the fuel efficiency
of rotating turbo-machine thermal power conversion devices while
decreasing the physical size for a given load. Further analytical
and experimental investigation of this concept is highly recommended. This
engine design merits further independent testing to quantify the
performance characteristics. The Diesel, Brayton and the Otto cycle engines are
known to be very compact and reliable prime movers. It
is somewhat surprising that the Atkinson cycle does quite well and scored
the highest of all engines considered at all four size ranges. The Atkinson cycle (as implemented by TurbX*)
is our recommendation as the most suitable engine to pursue even
though it is the least mature of the three.
Several prime movers should be considered for future developments and may
be satisfactory; specifically, the Atkinson cycle,
the open Brayton cycle (gas turbine), the 2-stroke diesel. The rotary
diesel and the solid oxide fuel cell should be backup candidates. Of all
these prime movers, the Atkinson cycle may well be the most suitable for
this application but is an immature technology.
* Inserted to establish context
NASA Letter November 22, 1996, Christopher A. Snyder, Thermodynamic Analysis Group Team Leader, Propulsion System Analysis Office, Phone 216-977-7018. In this letter Christopher A. Snyder states. "Your narrative shows a good deal of knowledge about potential issues about turbo machinery (such as high temperature operation of rotating parts as well as cooling and sealing issues)." "The TurbX Engine compares very favorably with these other engine cycles (and is more efficient that the gas turbine cycles)." "The
TurbX engine could have the maintenance of a gas turbine with the fuel
efficiency (above) that would be a real
boost for general aviation as well as other markets."
Richard
L. Puster, the Senior Combustion Scientist at NASA Langley states in his
letter of January 5, 2000. “The
concept as proposed by Dr. Wilson has
potential.” “The basic idea
is good and has merit.” “This would
be a good
engine for light aircraft and stationary power supplies as
well as all of the applications of the gas turbine.” “This is a major
development” Dr. H. Lee
Martin, the Executive Director of Tennessee Technology Development Corp.
states in a letter of January
5, 2000 “He is extremely
excited about the potential of this new TurbX engine.“ “We
believe that TurbX technology can have a huge
commercial impact.”
Christopher
A. Snyder, Thermodynamic Analysis Group Team
Leader of National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn Research Center, Lewis
Field. Further states in an additional Letter of
January 10, 2000. “The concept uses the pressure rise of constant-volume combustion
for additional work and efficiency
“ “aerodynamic
analysis of the compressor and turbine components is correct “ “The cycle should perform
at higher levels “ “Dr. Wilson
has suggested other losses, including these losses still suggests a
significant benefit for his cycle “ In
a proposal to further fund development of the TurbX Enhanced
Efficiency Cycle, Titled Development
Testing of Patented TurbXÔ Engine Submitted
by: R. L. Graves, Manager Advanced Propulsion Technology Engineering
Technology Division. DOE/Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) John F.
Thomas, A
member of the Engineering Testing and Review Team had the following
Comments “Some
clear and feasible claims were made that the device
can be a very high efficiency.” “A
design for a TurbX engine able to handle high gas temperatures
appeared to be quite feasible, as parts continuously exposed
to the highest temperature gas are stationary and could be cooled.” “it is my opinion is that this device could have potential
as an efficient engine or a compact and lightweight power source,
or both” J. C. Conklin, Thermodynamic Analysis Expert for the Department of Energy Oak Ridge National Laboratory States. “TurbX
engine concept cleverly substitutes a constant volume heat
addition process for the constant pressure heat addition
process normally found in gas turbine rotating turbo machinery
“ “The
thermal efficiency and power density can be proven as always
higher for any given compression ratio under ideal conditions
than the gas turbine that typically operates on the Brayton cycle” “Interestingly, the thermal efficiency and power density at
a constant shaft speed
are a function of the load for this ideal cycle, which is not the case for
the gas turbine. This inherent characteristic allows for fast
load changes at constant speed by simply modulating the fuel
flow rate, which is an easily controlled parameter” “TurbX
engine concept will have a higher allowable turbine inlet
temperature, and thus high thermal efficiency,
because the turbine components are not exposed to a constant high
temperature” “TurbX
concept engine clearly has the distinct advantages of
high thermal efficiency and high power density” “This
TurbX engine has the potential for improving the fuel efficiency
of rotating turbo-machine thermal power conversion devices while
decreasing the physical size for a given load” Copyright 2001-2008 Turbx |